登入帳戶  | 訂單查詢  | 購物車/收銀台(0) | 在線留言板  | 付款方式  | 聯絡我們  | 運費計算  | 幫助中心 |  加入書簽
會員登入   新用戶註冊
HOME新書上架暢銷書架好書推介特價區會員書架精選月讀2024年度TOP分類閱讀雜誌 香港/國際用戶
最新/最熱/最齊全的簡體書網 品種:超過100萬種書,正品正价,放心網購,悭钱省心 送貨:速遞 / 物流,時效:出貨後2-4日

2025年04月出版新書

2025年03月出版新書

2025年02月出版新書

2025年01月出版新書

2024年12月出版新書

2024年11月出版新書

2024年10月出版新書

2024年09月出版新書

2024年08月出版新書

2024年07月出版新書

2024年06月出版新書

2024年05月出版新書

2024年04月出版新書

2024年03月出版新書

『簡體書』关于形态变化对语序及主语脱落影响的历时性研究

書城自編碼: 2249683
分類: 簡體書→大陸圖書→社會科學語言文字
作者: 张立平
國際書號(ISBN): 9787510069871
出版社: 世界图书出版公司
出版日期: 2014-01-01
版次: 1 印次: 1
頁數/字數: 272/210000
書度/開本: 32开 釘裝: 平装

售價:NT$ 315

我要買

share:

** 我創建的書架 **
未登入.



新書推薦:
中国法律史学学说史(中国法学学术史丛书;国家出版基金项目)
《 中国法律史学学说史(中国法学学术史丛书;国家出版基金项目) 》

售價:NT$ 857.0
方尖碑(全2册)
《 方尖碑(全2册) 》

售價:NT$ 490.0
出土文献与汉唐法制史新论
《 出土文献与汉唐法制史新论 》

售價:NT$ 398.0
最美最美的博物书(全5册)
《 最美最美的博物书(全5册) 》

售價:NT$ 745.0
戏剧影视表演专业原创小品合集
《 戏剧影视表演专业原创小品合集 》

售價:NT$ 449.0
在游戏中培养自立的孩子
《 在游戏中培养自立的孩子 》

售價:NT$ 230.0
玄学与魏晋士人心态(精)--中华学术·有道
《 玄学与魏晋士人心态(精)--中华学术·有道 》

售價:NT$ 398.0
雪的练习生
《 雪的练习生 》

售價:NT$ 347.0

建議一齊購買:

+

NT$ 402
《大手笔是怎样炼成的(语言篇+修炼篇)》
+

NT$ 465
《党政公文写作技法、规律与处理全书》
+

NT$ 405
《实用文案与活动策划撰写技巧及实例全书》
+

NT$ 432
《主题活动主持词范例精选》
+

NT$ 495
《水远山长:汉字清幽的意境(第二版)》
內容簡介:
本书的主要内容为通过对形态变化做历时性分析来研究形态变化对语序及主语脱落的影响,形态变化包括形态格和动词的性数一致词缀,都是语序变化及主语脱落的决定性因素。本书结构严谨、富有理论深度,对学界具有较高的实践意义。
目錄
List of Abbreviations VI
Introduction XI
Chapter l A Study of the Contemporary Morphological Researches
1.1 Contemporary Morphological Researches on Word Order
1.1.1 Rohrbacher 1999
1.1.1.1 Strong agreement hypothesis
1.1.1.2 Bobaljik''s 2002 view on the strong agreement hypothesis
1.1.2.1 Effects of syntactic structure variation
1.1.2.2 0ur view on Bobaljik''s 2002 hypotheses
1.1.3 I Nominative case-marking hypothesis
1.1.31 Counterevidence from Faroese
1.1.4 I The hypothesis of overt distinct agreement marking
1.1.4.2 0ur view based on Rohrbacher''s 1999 counterevidence
1.1.5 H01mbergnd Platzack1 995 1
1.1.5.2 Finiteness feature
1.1.5.3 0ur relative proposals
1.2 Researches on Subj ect Omission
1.2.1 Chomsky 1981, 1982
1.2.2 Jaeggli and Safir 19 8 9
1.2.3 Shortcomings of the two null subj ect hypotheses
1.2.4 Vainikka and Levy 1999
I .2.41 Pronominal correspondence
1.2.4.2 0ur view on Vainikka and Levy''s 1999 hypothesis
Chapter 2 Theoretical Background and Main Proposals ofMorphological Effects
2.1Morphological Evolution
2.1.1 Theoretical background
2.1.1.1 0riginal morphological inflections
2.1.1.2 Tendency of morphological evolution
2.1.2 Process of morphological evolution
2.1.3 Verbal agreement paradigms of different richness degrees
2.1.4 0ur hypothesis about ways of language evolution...
2.2 Language Classification with Respect to Verbal Agreement Morphology
2.2.1 Presence of the functional category Agr
2.2.2 C-Agr vs T-Agr
2.2.3 Classification of agreement paradigms
2.2.3.1 Classification in our analysis ofword order variation
2.2.3.2 Classification in our analysis of subj ect omission 5
2.2.3.3 Subdivision of degraded rich agreement morphology
2.3 Theoretical Background about Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change 64
2.3.1 Haeberli''s 2000 diachronic study
2.3.2 Word computation
2.4 0ur Proposals of Morphological Effects on Syntax
2.4 1 Two a伍xation levels
2.4.2 Psychological evidence for affixation levels .
2.4.3 Morphological influence on subject omission
2.5 Language Change as a Continuum
Chapter 3 A Diachronic Study of the Romance Languages
3.1 Evolutional Process of Romance Morphology
3.1.1 Ancestor of the Romance languages
3.1.2 Developmental tendency of clitics
3.1.2.1 From simple clitics to special clitics
3.1.2.2 From prefixes to sumxes
3.1.3 Evolution of Romance clitics
3.1.4 0ptional positions of Romance clitics
3.21Romanian morphology
3.2.2 Romanian syntax
3.2.2 1 Unset head parameter value 1
3.2.2.2 Free word order
3.2.2.3V-to-Tmovement 1
3.3IItalianmorphology 114
3.3.2.1 Change of the head parameter value
3.3.2.2 Change from C-Agr to T-Agr
3.2.2.3 V-to-T movement
3.2.2.4 V-to-C movement
3.3.2.5 Comparison between Romanian and Italian
3.4.1 French morphology
3.4.2Frenchsyntax 13
3.4.2.1 0bligatory vs optional clitic doubling in Colloquial
3.4.2.2 Fixed word order
3.4.2.3 V-to-T movement
Chapter 4 A Diachronic Study of the Germanic Languages
4.1 Classification of the Germanic Languages
4.2 Morphological Evolution of the Germanic Languages
4.2.1 Gothic morphology
4.2.2 Morphology of the North Germanic languages
4.2.2.2 Comparison between Old Scandinavian and the Romance
4.2.2.3 Modem Icelandic
4.2.2.4 Mainland Scandinavian languages 15
4.2.3 Morphology of the West Germanic languages
4.2.3 1 German morphology 1
4.2.3.2 Morphological development in English
4.3 Syntactic Comparison of the North Germanic Languages
4.3.1.1 Unset head parameter value
4.31.2Free wordorder
4.3.1.3 Syntactic effects of morphological development
4.3.2 Similarities in the modern Scandinavian languages
4.3.2.1 Head parameter value
4.3.2.2 Verb second constraint
4.3.3 Differences in the modem Scandinavian languages
4.3.4 EMCs in Scandinavian
4.4 Syntax of the West Germanic Languages 1
4.4 11V-to-C movement 1
4.41.2V-to-Tmovement 1
4.4.2.1 V-to-T movement in Old English
4.4.2.2 Loss of V-to-T movement in Modern English
4.4.2.3 Base-generated position of be and have
4.4.2.4 Loss of OV pattern in Modern English
Chapter 5 Null Subject Permission
5 I Main Proposals on Subj ect Omission
5.1.1 Classification of agreement paradigms
5.1.2 Licensing conditions of different null subj ects
5.1.3 Loss of empty topics
5 1 .4 Re-interpretation of topics
5.2 Full-null-subj ect Languages vs Non-null-subj ect Languages
5.21Full-null-subj ect languages
5 .2.2 Non-null-subj ect languages 2
5 .3 Semi-null-subj ect Languages 2 1
5.3.1 0ld Scandinavian and Modern Icelandic
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
內容試閱
In this chapter, we will introduce some of the contemporarymorphological researches on word order and subject omission Wewill show that in the analyses of word order variation, most of thecontemporary morphological studies are from a synchronic perspectiveand generally focus on one single aspect of morphology; therefore, theycannot cover all the syntactic differences among human languages In ouropinion, a diachronic comparison of morphological paradigms is quiteimportant in the analysis of syntactic variation.
Moreover, we will show that a single or a few syntactic parameters,as proposed in many generativists'' frameworks cf Chomsky 1981, 1982;Jaeggli and Safir 1989, cannot cover all the null subject phenomena,because there are three types of null subjects and the licensing conditionof each kind of null subject is different Compared to thegenerativists''studies, an analysis based on morphological comparison, like Vainikkaand Levy''s 1999 analysis of the pronominal connection, appears to bemore flexible in that different licensing conditions of subject omissionare even allowed to be present in one language Nevertheless, theirnull subject analysis only considers null thematic subjects, withoutconsideration of null expletives, which is actually a hotly debated topicin syntax.

 

 

書城介紹  | 合作申請 | 索要書目  | 新手入門 | 聯絡方式  | 幫助中心 | 找書說明  | 送貨方式 | 付款方式 台灣用户 | 香港/海外用户
megBook.com.tw
Copyright (C) 2013 - 2025 (香港)大書城有限公司 All Rights Reserved.