孙晓霞，黑龙江佳木斯人。英语语言文学专业文学博士。现为南京师范大学外国语言文学博士后流动站人员，副教授，德国科隆大学系统音乐学专业博士研究生。2009年至2010年，曾在美国亚利桑那大学T.G．Bever教授主持的心理语言学实验室学习。主要研究方向为应用语言学、神经语言学、语言哲学。发表论文十余篇，代表作有《汉语关系从句加工的研究及发展》、《心智哲学的演化和语言研究的方向》、《语言和音乐：语言认知研究的新视角》、Syntax of Mind-Semantics of Mind: Two Frameworks for Comparative Approaches to the Evolution o， Music and Language等。现主持江苏省博士后科研资助项目1项、与德国科隆大学合作项目1项。
目錄：
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Motivation of the study
1.1.1 The importance of studying relative clauses
1.1.2 Universal processing preference and Current gaps
1.2 Aims and research questions of the study
1.3 Structure of the book
Chapter Two: Typology of relative clauses
2.1 Types of relative clauses
2.1.1 External-headed RCs vs.Internal-headed RCs vs.Correlative RCs
2.1.2 Postnominalhead-initial RCs vs.Prenominalhead-final RCs
2.1.3 Subject-extracted RCs vs.Object-extracted RCs
2.1.4 Subject-modifying RCs vs.Object-modifying RCs
2.2 Word order type and RC type
2.3 Typological characteristics of English relative clauses
2.3.1 Restrictive vs.non-restrictive clauses in English
2.3.2 Derivation of English RCs
2.4 Typological characteristics of Chinese relative clauses
2.4.1 Typological characteristics of Chinese
2.4.2 The Uniqueness of Chinese RCs
Chapter Three: Sentence Processing Models
3.1 Universal subject preference
3.1.1 Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy
3.1.2 ExperienceFrequency-based accounts
3.2 Working memory accounts Gibson, 1998; 2000
3.2.1 Storage Resources
3.2.2 Integration Cost
3.2.3 A brief comment: a bridge connecting structural theories and processing theories
3.3 Structure-based theories
3.3.1 Filler-Gap Domain FGD Hawkins, 1999;2004
3.3.2 Phrase-Structural Distance Hypothesis O''Grady,1997
3.4 Word order theory
3.4.1 Canonical word order vs.non-canonical word order
3.4.2 Prediction about the English RC processing
3.4.3 Prediction about Chinese RC processing
3.5 Pragmatic functional perspective shift
3.5.1 Subject as a default perspective of readers
3.5.2 Prediction about English RC processing
3.5.3 Prediction about Chinese RC processing
3.6 An evaluation of predictions about English and Chinese RC processing
Chapter Four: Previous studies and findings
4.1 Processing relative clauses
4.1.1 Basic observations
4.1.2 Neurophysiological evidence
4.1.3 Neuroanatomical evidence
4.2 Consistent results of universality from English RC processing
4.2.1 General remarks
4.2.2 Eye-movement monitor
4.2.3 Self-paced reading
4.2.4 Event-related potential studies
4.2.5 Brain imaging studies using fMRI and PET
4.2.6 Lesion studies: Aphasia
4.3 Mixed results from Chinese RC processing
4.3.1 Self-paced reading
4.3.2 A maze task--mixed results
4.3.3 Corpora study--supporting universal processing preference
4.3.4 Event-related potential studies
Chapter Five: An ERP experiment on Chinese RC Processing
5.1 ERP methodology
5.1.1 An overview of ERP
5.1.2 Geodesic EEG System GES
5.1.3 Software-relating ERP experiments
5.1.4 ERP language-related components
5.2 The ERP experiment design on Chinese relative clause processing
5.2.1 Aims
5.2.2 Participants
5.2.3 Materials and task
5.2.4 Design
5.2.5 Procedure
5.2.6 Electrophysiological recordings and preprocessing
5.2.7 Data analysis
5.3 Results
5.3.1 Behavioral results
5.3.2 Spatial Aspects of the ERP data
5.3.3 Statistical results
5.4 Discussions
5.4.1 Testing prior results of processing asymmetry
5.4.2 Involvement of topicalized sentences
5.4.3 Minimal pair analysis
5.4.4 Evaluation of sentence processing models
5.5 Conclusions
5.5.1 Non-applicability of universal subject preference to Chinese
5.5.2 General phenomenon of object relatives preference in Chinese
5.5.3 Non-existence of a universal processing model
5.5.4 Other findings contributing to a comprehensive model
Chapter Six: Concluding remarks
6.1 General findings
6.2 Significance of the study
6.3 Limitations of the study
6.4 Suggestions for future research
References
Appendix : Experimental Materials
購物車/收銀台(0) | 在線留言板
| 付款方式
| 聯絡我們
| 運費計算
| 幫助中心 |
加入書簽
HOME
新書上架
